Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Larry's avatar

Well, I guess the phrase comes to me from Churchill via Goldwater who put his own spin on it and so I put my spin: Portlanders are making the rubble bounce.

I knew Multnomah County had it within itself for slow and thorough self-destruction . The real mystery here is why do you have to be a citizen to vote! That outrage will be corrected I'm sure.

And then my second favorite quote with regard to Portland comes from Oscar Wilde when he read of Little Nell's passing, but I apply it to the outcome of the recent election: “A MAN would need to have a heart of stone, not to laugh.”

Of course Kotek has yet to be naugurated and I doubt I'll be seeing JoAnne checking at the dollar store. She's an influencer.

Let's all keep our fingers crossed for the Bay Area carpetbagging Sapphist, Democrat Jamie McLeod-Skinner. Come to Oregon where the future is exciting.

One by one the lights are flickering out in Oregon and the nation. Will either survive my lifetime? Ohh, the excitement is just starting!

Expand full comment
Ollie Parks's avatar

The new city council's 1st order of business will be to establish a city Bureau of Degentrification, make cultural appropriation a crime, prohibit those evil, rich business and real estate types from being in Portland after sunset and change the city motto to "Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Anti-Racism."

Seriously, though, the question is whether the powers that be will continue the exclusionary practices that produced a charter commission with no conservative voices that also grossly underrepresented the white community, or whether there will be true diversity in opinion, race and ethnicity.

What no pundit in town with a job they want to keep will say is twofold. First, the charter revision signals a collapse of trust in white politicians on the part of Portland's woke minorities. Secondly, it represents the triumph of the racial or ethic identity group over the individual as the basic unit in Portland's democracy. How else is it possible to explain the rejection of a system that produced a city council where 60 percent of the members are minorities, or 80 percent if sexual minorities are included? The truest words ever spoken about the charter project came from the minority-group proponent who said, in effect, that they want their representatives to look like them.

If that's where we're headed, the bureau that oversees the construction of new governmental facilities had better get busy designing Portland's own Dis-United City Council Building, modeled on the United Nations Building in New York.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts