The victimology here almost seems as if it emerged from the Old Testament. Children victimized by adults may well have their human needs assessed according to the skin color of the perpetrator. It's one thing to have human worth determined by some arcane standard of tribal justice but something else entirely when that justice only matters in relation to some formula where parity among racial groups is the goal. Anti-racism ultimately becomes so arbitrary that the compassionate care afforded depends less on the facts of the case than the demand for a predetermined conclusion. Does this qualify as pre-modern or post-modern?
I'm not sure how society ever rescues itself from the rabbit-holes of dialectical victimhood. Rabbinical judges might help but even they will necessarily consume their own humane instincts for the sake of something that is primitive and incomprehensible. Everything old is new again.
If Presearch isn't on your radar you might want to give it a try. DuckDuckGo has begun de-prioritizing results with "misinformation", although still pretty useful (for now).
As a lifelong prosecutor, who has tried more child abuse cases than i care to recall, this sounds cosmically stupid.
An “algorithm” intended to reduce the number of suspects who are racial minorities?
One way to view this is that the bureaucrats don’t care about child abuse victims who have the misfortune of being abused by a racial minority, overwhelmingly themselves minority group members.
Another reason we need to end the cabal run by Brown/Kotek et al.
Vote for Betsy Johnson, the ONLY candidate for Governor to vote AGAINST repealing juvenile Measure 11 (SB 1008, from the 2019 session)
The victimology here almost seems as if it emerged from the Old Testament. Children victimized by adults may well have their human needs assessed according to the skin color of the perpetrator. It's one thing to have human worth determined by some arcane standard of tribal justice but something else entirely when that justice only matters in relation to some formula where parity among racial groups is the goal. Anti-racism ultimately becomes so arbitrary that the compassionate care afforded depends less on the facts of the case than the demand for a predetermined conclusion. Does this qualify as pre-modern or post-modern?
I'm not sure how society ever rescues itself from the rabbit-holes of dialectical victimhood. Rabbinical judges might help but even they will necessarily consume their own humane instincts for the sake of something that is primitive and incomprehensible. Everything old is new again.
If Presearch isn't on your radar you might want to give it a try. DuckDuckGo has begun de-prioritizing results with "misinformation", although still pretty useful (for now).
As a lifelong prosecutor, who has tried more child abuse cases than i care to recall, this sounds cosmically stupid.
An “algorithm” intended to reduce the number of suspects who are racial minorities?
One way to view this is that the bureaucrats don’t care about child abuse victims who have the misfortune of being abused by a racial minority, overwhelmingly themselves minority group members.
Another reason we need to end the cabal run by Brown/Kotek et al.
Vote for Betsy Johnson, the ONLY candidate for Governor to vote AGAINST repealing juvenile Measure 11 (SB 1008, from the 2019 session)